Despite the clear warning where our email address is listed on this blog, some stupid people still think that they can email Death Threats against Julian Assange or "WikiLeakS.org" people in general to our email address, which is not associated with the WikiLeakS.org project.
Such Death Threats are:
a) Against the Acceptable Use Policy and legal Terms and Conditions of your contract with your Internet Service Provider and with your Email Provider.
b) Actually an extraditable Criminal Offence in many legal jurisdictions, with a penalty of up to 10 years in prison, regardless of any US First Amendment rights to free speech.
N.B.. this blog is not published in the USA
For example
Return-Path: <6937toni@att.net>
[...]
Received: from [216.252.122.217] by n70.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Aug 2010 22:57:51 -0000
Received: from [98.136.44.161] by t2.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Aug 2010 22:57:51 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp602.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Aug 2010 22:57:51 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 535606.88313.bm@omp602.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 22479 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Aug 2010 22:57:51 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1281653871; bh=zUcr6UWVDz/czDZ+s6/tlx5dh5iM8eYiAT98vHkAbhA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Dfurk3CA1fukItexIw4V8JQBOBZqWll2jsN/RLrJPil6cEzuMt3QwZgQp3GlVg1pP5dWeXrAf1jo4QSq9P5YqWFBhxj3sk7sLqmst2CLMp9QMJjnqqMpwr6OrettxdZBhp9Q85Rrpe2DSDbPRoS0ZqTI5XEZDj+K4V9V8WurmZM=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=att.net;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=CiDeFee9Q3RaA3WqaQ0zrJIaklXILdYDCrmbA7w7vsd+USQTeJulc2eBksRQiCJjpjCTrmKqaThPWL4BbE5JqaGOj88vk39y8JQa9mtR1evw/5EQlj6P3sZkD0IexNVZNG8Oz91HO/pBV9xvIgXvnp7MUfq2UTU+bG6TXleM9G8=;
Message-ID: <343637.22380.qm@web180709.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 0dC7GrwVM1lYcTUBc0iJmotaTJq1ZrKUnC.B56i8kFB9hsr
7M5otKAfuDpnmqpmi76m7iqdTTd53yYC8xwj_zk5NIs4.P_jvZ14XDw1hAVx
WVbdIWU2yInRHewkCpX4BzWJ3RmkQe2cUjY8OT4uR5faYk88wI87bokG0QCQ
X26Jk9DrlJSUIm91iJM2bRgM9FZ1XoYNvy.UQW1weAvl9KYyxOKzmNeD5dVm
M6KZ6KU34cxeJx0UMIFRVz6YRaakpDw1Tz.W1TP9cv2qH_6n84gKlC4NzKGA
-
Received: from [75.13.166.150] by web180709.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:57:50 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: matthew brian <6937toni@att.net>
Subject: assange
To: blog@WikiLeak.org
It may will take me some time to find this creep and when I meet him face to
face the only and last thing he will see will be the barrel of a 45 cal. colt
thsat will swipe of the smirl of this creeps face permanently and the same
goes for the creep in berlin, he is a littel easire to find because we already
know where he leaves. SEE YOU VERY SOON
Note to "matthew brian" this blog post will continue to "name and shame" you in perpetuity via Google searches etc., unless and until you apologise and promise to donate, say 50 US Dollars to a suitable Afghan war charity.
If anything ever does happen to Julian Assange or to "Daniel Schmidt", guess who is going to be one of the prime suspects in a criminal investigation ? You are.
I agree with the general motif of your post but in the present case the study of the circulation of tweet is very interresting
the first post on the ice rocketI have seen on the allégation of rape was a post of
CARMEN VILLAR MIR / CORRESPONSAL EN ESTOCOLMO Día 21/08/2010 - 08.42h (european hour)La denuncia por violación contra Julian Assange"
which refer to his article
http://www.abc.es/20100821/internacional/wikileaks-201008210733.html
she mention the tabloid and the way to obtain the front page
And in fifteen minutes begin the big buzz
That I understand ot this manipulation is that the tabloid was not quoted by any great research motor and conséquently don't génerated any information alert
For the beginning of "la mayonnaise" It seems that has been used the intermission of the ABC news.
Don't forget that 3,5 billions people as me don't talk swedish and that the automatical translations générated are completly stupid
I don't believe a great number of reporters have a single corespondant in Sweden to explain that the paper was a tabloid shit and the word latin"in absentia" as in a comedy of Molière seems to be a very great proof..