If this comment here on this blog earlier on Friday , apparently posted via an IP address in France, is genuinely from someone who is a spokesman for the WikiLeakS.org project ,
please put a prominent link to http://wikileaks.org/ as there is a lot of press using the non-plural mistakenlyPosted by: Wikileaks | | August 31, 2007 06:44 PM
then we are must remind them that they have not yet earned our trust, and that WikiLeak.org blog does not yet fully endorse the WikiLeakS.org project
We must point out that there were at least 10 URL links to WikiLeakS.org visible on the front page when this comment was posted.
This WikiLeak.org website does not attempt to pass itself off as the genuine WikiLeakS.org website, as should be clear from our capitalisation to distinguish between the two.
If anybody is confused, then that is not our fault.
We would like to know who the idiots amateurs were who chose the name "wikileaks", for a global internet project, and did not bother to register all of the shorter, easier to spell versions of the name and all of the appropriate common top level domain name extensions.
We could simply be Man-in-the-Middle snooping on people erroneously connecting via this website to WikILeakS.org, and collecting their details in our webserver logfiles and possibly also snarfing people's log in editing credentials, however, we do not intend to do that.
We are hopefully providing a little feedback and constructive criticism of the project and some discussion on the wider issues about whistleblowing which remain, whether WikiLeakS.org achieves its stated aims or not.
I find your website to be nothing more than misinformation and distraction. Your links are underdeveloped and you do not actually have any kind of online community.
I do not fully understand the motivation of this site unless some party or another is deliberately trying to distract from wikileaks.org.
@ This is ridiculous - Can you point to an example of misinformation on this blog ?
There are plenty of unanswered questions which have still not yet been addressed by the wikileakS.org project since its inception.
Their recent abandonment of, say the use of PGP encryption and or digital signatures, is making them appear even less trustworthy than before.